Items 3-5 were taken together.
A paper which covered Items 3-5 was circulated in advance of the meeting and outlined mental health services broadly. The overview of services provided included General Adult Mental Health; Child & Youth Mental Health; Psychiatry of Later Life; Mental Health of Intellectual Disability; and Forensic Services.
The discussion at the meeting followed on from the patient experiences and focused largely on CAMHS. It was highlighted that the National Office for Child and Youth Mental Health has now been established and is led by the HSE’s Assistant National Director and National Clinical Lead for Child and Youth Mental Health. The Committee discussed the importance of there being ‘no wrong door’ to access these services and that parents should not need to navigate a complex system to secure care for their children. The Committee was advised that work is ongoing in this area and there will be a focus on ensuring single points of access for service users. The Committee highlighted that referrals by GPs should also be part of a single point of access and there should be direct contact with their patient’s consultants available to GPs.
The Committee discussed the performance data for CAMHs provided in the above paper and queried whether the KPIs listed were good enough to provide sufficient assurance for CAMHS performance. A Burke confirmed that they are currently looking to redefine KPIs to improve the assurance possible and to make them more useful for clinicians. However, without an upgrade of IT systems the data used will not be consistently available. The need for a modernised IT system was emphasised as critical to enabling the necessary improvements in, and oversight and governance of, CAMHs as well as other mental health services.
The Committee was advised that another two of the main challenges facing CAMHS are the recruitment pause and lack of multiannual funding. There is a substantial level of investment required to improve sustainability of the service and to develop a comprehensive service model. Multiannual funding would greatly assist in this regard as without it, services are in annual cycle without comprehensive timelines or costs. In relation to the recruitment pause, the Committee was advised that there was an adverse effect on small teams in CAMHS composed of one staff member of each discipline and it was highlighted that the profile of staffing in CAMHS is similar to disabilities which is not impacted by the pause.
In relation to Policy and Strategy landscape areas, the following were covered as part of the briefing paper: Sharing the Vision; Connecting for Life; the Maskey Report; and Sláintecare and integration. The discussion focused on the HSE’s implementation of Sharing the Vision (StV). The implementation of the recommendations of the policy and the 10 work streams underway to achieve them were discussed. In particular, the Committee discussed those which are listed as not started/paused and were advised that these are not being progressed largely due to external factors such as budget prioritisation.
IT systems were again highlighted as major delivery issue, as was the lack of multi-annual funding. It was highlighted that services can’t speak to each other efficiently without an IT upgrade and this was resulting in services being unduly separated for example, separation between disability and mental health.
It was agreed that Catherine Brogan, independent chair for the Sharing the Vision National Implementation and Monitoring Committee, would be invited to a future S&Q Committee meeting.
The implementation framework for the Maskey Report was discussed and it was noted that the Maskey recommendations were made in 3 broad areas: clinical, governance and supporting (for example, IT or estates). Governance in particular was discussed and the Committee was advised that the governance of the new CHI CAMHS service will come under one structure across both the CHO & CHI. The Committee were advised that a broad Child and Youth Mental health programme and action plan is being developed nationally to cover the actions in relation to Maskey, as well as consolidating the Mental Health Commission (MHC) recommendations, National audits, StV and the clinical programmes into one overarching service improvement programme.
In relation to Regulatory Compliance, the Committee discussed the MHC’s Annual Report 2022. It was highlighted that the MHC expressed ongoing concern about low levels of compliance with four key regulations, namely premises, individual care planning, risk management and staffing in HSE facilities. The Committee discussed in particular infrastructure and were advised that assurance has been sought from HSE Estates that the necessary improvements will be delivered. The Committee was advised that the MHC regulatory remit will expand to 24 hour supported residences in the community once the amendment bill to the Mental Health Act 2001, which is due as priority legislation later this year, is enacted. The HSE along with other stakeholders will work with the MHC on the development of standards to enable regulation to commence.
It was agreed that the Committee Chairs would bring a note on issues raised during the meeting to the Board.
Mental Health Executive members and P&P Committee members left the meeting.